We have seen that the world of "texting" has transcended social networks becoming cyber and the particular language in one common. Now, what are the implications for language? Truth is, many believe that texting during class is extremely bad. Students have the right to practice the vocabulary this way. Specialists believe that this form of language is a phenomenon that, many agree, is possible cause for concern or a red alert that puts the 'correct' language in danger of extinction. This is observable in some people who are already used to go for the abbreviations that apply to forms or documents for their constant use.
This texting trend proposes a new role of spoken or written language. During class, they tend to abbreviate similar to that of "texting" as part of everyday life, shows that indeed the language in its instrumental function effectively used this time to meet the business needs to transmit customers a sense of equality of interest or knowledge level. It also shows how regulatory language, as it is a sign of control and empowerment of jargon and constructed within society.
Making sense or not?
According to many, literacy is seen as a set of ways to use language and make sense of both in speech and in writing that are linked to world views and values are certain beliefs or social or cultural groups integrally connected with the identity or self-consciousness of the people who practice them. So is the "texting" as a literacy practice that represents a vision of the world we live in and a group of people who identify with this practice? Say yes. On the other hand, some perspectives address that this is all about the literacy of today, these are: the socio-cultural approach, someone behind the text, each community has its particular forms of literacy, language use varies over space and time and finally the meaning of the word originated in the community. It will continue to see this common practice associated with "texting" and increasingly between different areas of the population.
While many aspects are at stake, officially "texting" is an example of literacy as part of our social practice, exercised by many and rejected by others. It is our language of the 21st century.
Believe it or not, many do not agree at all that the use of texting is to impair language. The languages are not caught in time entities but evolve. Notice how each time to accept new words and grammar changes according to how it is changing in each language. Moreover, some believe that texting has a role, a reason. When you have little time and space, you can abbreviate what you say. If you did not have to send multiple messages, which would give more work, texting language type may be found on the label of a commodity. This shows how the market appropriates a form of language that is not yours; you are not entitled to establish a link with the potential consumer. For instance, the store where you saw that label is directed toward a portion of the population that knows how to "read" this particular form of language. Do not try texting during class, though. You need to pay attention. Language is the key just as knowledge. Get ready to venture onto grammar and the top spelling corrections ever!
Do you believe texting during class is bad? Which are your thoughts about texting aspects? Share your beliefs now!