Mitchell vs. wisconsin

View Paper
Pages: 12
(approximately 235 words/page)

Essay Database > Literature > English
Mitchell v. Wisconsin Why Mitchell v. Wisconsin Sucked On June 11, 1993, the United State Supreme Court upheld Wisconsin¹s penalty enhancement law, which imposes harsher sentences on criminals who ³intentionally select the person against whom the committed..because of the race, religion, color, disability, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry of that person.² Chief Justice Rehnquist deliverd the opinion of the unanimous Court. This paper argues against the decision, and will attempt to prove …

showed first 75 words of 3422 total
Sign up for EssayTask and enjoy a huge collection of student essays, term papers and research papers. Improve your grade with our unique database!
showed last 75 words of 3422 total
…v ------------------------------------------------------------------------ **Bibliography** Bibliography Cacas, Samuel. ³Hate Crime Sentences Can Now Be Enhanced Under A New Federal Law.² Human Rights 22 (1995): 32-33 Feingold, Stanley. ³Hate Crime Legislation Muzzles Free Speech.² The National Law Journal 15 (July 1, 1993): 6, 16 Gellman, Susan. ³Sticks And Stones.² UCLA Law Review 39 (December, 1991): 333-396 Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire R.A.V. v. St. Paul Texas v. Johnson U.S. v. O¹Brien Wisconsin v. Mitchell Wooley v. Maynard W.V. State Board of Education v